Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +1144%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK107
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy