Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (160W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +102%
7.119 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
2496
144
TMUs
208
64
ROPs
40
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK110
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy