NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (2100MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9.492 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A
+1191%
122.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
14592
192
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104B
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
146 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
