Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +9487%
9.492 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

110W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy