Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +2371%
9.492 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

110W
TDP
226W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy