NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1815MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000
+35%
11.15 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
80
48
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GA107S
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
545 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
