Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +5245%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
4
4608
Shading Units
96
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GF108
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy