Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +979%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro 7000
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
851 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
163.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
14
4608
Shading Units
512
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GF110
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy