Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +1055%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
768
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK106
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy