Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +2300%
14.93 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
30
4608
Shading Units
240
288
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
188W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT200B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy