NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages

Released 4 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2050MHz vs 1620MHz)

Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

14.93 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Flex 170 +12%

16.79 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

Data Center GPU Flex 170

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Aug 2022

Quadro

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz

Base Clock

1950 MHz

1620 MHz

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

48GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

256bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

4608

Shading Units

4096

288

TMUs

256

96

ROPs

128

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

32

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

6 MB

L2 Cache

16 MB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

262.4 GPixel/s

466.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

524.8 GTexel/s

29.86 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

33.59 TFLOPS

14.93 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.79 TFLOPS

466.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

DG2-512

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

ACM-G10

Turing

Architecture

Generation 12.7

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

6 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

21.7 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

406 mm²

Board Design

260W

TDP

150W

600 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

2

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

3

NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

5

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

7

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

2

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

3

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

4

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

5

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

6

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

7

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

8

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

9

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

10

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W