Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1620MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m +52%
5.046 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro T2000 Max Q +4%
71
Tesla K40m
68
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy