NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2100MHz vs 1785MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A
+3253%
122.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
