Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +16518%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy