Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200 +995%
0.252 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro VX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
1
112
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy