Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD FirePro A300

AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 660M and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 660M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 110% (1900MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 660M +109%
1.459 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Rembrandt
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
1900 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
6
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
45.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
2.918 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1459 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
32 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
210 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy