Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD FirePro A300

AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 760M and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 760M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 187% (2599MHz vs 905MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 760M +665%
5.323 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi III IGP(Phoenix Mobile)
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
2599 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.58 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
83.17 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.323 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
332.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
32 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy