Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock863MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 765M +2662%
1.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2013
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
863 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
-
-
-
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy