Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock990MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh +955%
4.055 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jul 2022
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
622 MHz
-
Boost Clock
990 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.68 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.055 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.055 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
63.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GA107
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy