Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 Max Q +3618%
14.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
320
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.6 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.28 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GA104
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy