Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E6465 vs AMD FirePro M4000

AMD Radeon E6465 vs AMD FirePro M4000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 33W)
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro M4000 +259%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
8
160
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Chelsea
-
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy