Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1200MHz vs 1000MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E8950 +66%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
256.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
E8950
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy