Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro W4170M

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro W4170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1219MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +80%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Apr 2015
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Opal
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy