Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1300MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M +326%
5.325 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jun 2023
Embedded
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

40W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
DG2-256
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
103 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy