Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1594MHz vs 1219MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +1%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Feb 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GP108
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy