Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1200MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 PCIe +169%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
896
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
GP108B
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy