Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +2938%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Mar 2009
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
64
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
G94
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy