Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1266MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +249%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Aug 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
720 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.76 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.333 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.667 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU117
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy