AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1650MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+130%
5.834 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Oct 2020
Embedded
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
DG1
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
232 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
