Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +3951%
5.834 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
Embedded
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
120
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
M86
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy