Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1266MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +171%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Sep 2016
Embedded
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Baffin
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy