Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1266MHz vs 1250MHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 210W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 56 +53%
8.96 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Aug 2017
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1138 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
3584
144
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.00 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
280.0 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.960 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
560.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
210W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Vega 10
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy