Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1266MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +821%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2014
Embedded
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Opal
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy