Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2090MHz vs 1266MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900M +560%
38.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Oct 2023
Embedded
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
4608
144
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
180W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 31
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Navi 31
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy