Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1266MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +1032%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Nov 2017
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
256
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GM108S
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Maxwell
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy