Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI +1004%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy