Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 380

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 380 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380 +1969%
3.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.476 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.476 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
217.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Antigua
-
GPU Variant
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy