Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +5020%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy