Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560D +1153%
2.106 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Polaris 21
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy