Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 590

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +4137%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
Radeon R600
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Polaris 30
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy