Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
10432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe +9644%
37.42 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Oct 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
84
320
Shading Units
10752
16
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GA102
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy