Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI FireGL V5600

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +100%
0.384 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
3
320
Shading Units
120
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV630
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
89W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy