Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI FirePro V7800

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800 +425%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
18
320
Shading Units
1440
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cypress
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy