Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FireStream 9250

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +110%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV770
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy