Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 240W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XTX +495%
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
80
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

240W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cedar
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy