Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.18GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
693 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.18GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.184 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
6.368 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
191.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV635
GPU Name
RV380
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy