Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU

ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4250 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock921MHz
88 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250 IGP
0.044 TFLOPS
Jetson Nano GPU +436%
0.236 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2010
Release Date
May 2019
TeraScale IGP
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
640 MHz
-
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
2.240 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
GM20B
-
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
-
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
20 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy