Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +6792%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2015
Northern Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
56
80
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Fiji
Cedar PRO
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy