Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6390 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon HD 6390 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6390 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6390 's Advantages
Lower TDP (39W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6390
0.352 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +867%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
Northern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

39W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Tahiti
Redwood LE
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy