Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6625M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD Radeon HD 6625M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6625M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6625M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6625M
0.432 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +2906%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Vancouver
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
480
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
10.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
AD107
Whistler LP
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy